Whether reading a fantasy with an emphasis on realism, or simply
seeking to understand the way people thought in the past, these three
books offer a great guide to political, military, and everyday
thinking.
Strictly speaking more Renaissance than medieval, the archetypal
politician’s handbook is still relevant to both the modern and
medieval worlds. Machiavelli’s work, which includes many historical
examples (frequently classical but also more recent), is a
masterpiece on human psychology and the realities of power. It
reached an infamous status in the past due to its chapters regarding
when it’s appropriate for leaders to lie to their people, and why
it’s better to be feared than loved.
The Prince offers little in the way of rhetorical flimflam, and
offers the unvarnished (and sometimes uncomfortable) truth about why
those in power act the way they do. It’s a great book to read in
itself, and excellent as a guide for how leaders think and act (in
both governance and military spheres), particularly before democracy
became quite so popular.
[As an aside, those into audiobooks may wish to check out the edition
narrated by Ian Richardson. It’s like having Francis Urquhart give
you lessons in political cunning].
Getting the balance right when it comes to mercy and brutality in
medieval warfare can be very difficult, as the way of thinking in
those days is so different to modern morality. By Sword and Fire does
a great job of putting the rationale in context, and explaining why
certain actions that today would be universally condemned (Richard
the Lionheart and Saladin executing prisoners in the Holy Land) made
sense at the time, without imposing modern norms on the medieval
world.
As you might expect, it’s a grim book, so those who are easily upset by such things shouldn’t read it. However, I found it invaluable as a resource to understand how mercy and brutality could be justified (and advantageous for the commander) in a medieval setting.
This
is an absolutely fantastic read that puts the reader in the shoes of
a 14th
century fellow. It’s a sort of everyman’s history, looking at the
food people ate, the way they travelled, what they wore, how justice
worked, and so on. For everyday details it’s utterly invaluable and
packed with interesting snippets of information (one of the best is
that monks had a rule preventing them eating meat in the refectory,
leading them to invent a secondary dining room called the misericord,
in which they did eat meat).
Being
roughly situated in the 14th
century, the book includes information about what it’s like when
harvests fail, or plague strikes. It is very much about people and
the world in which they lived, and is of great use in trying to see
things from the perspective of an ordinary sort of fellow.
[Equivalent
editions are available by the same author for Elizabethan England,
and Restoration Britain, the latter of which I’m currently reading
and will review].
These three books collectively offer fantastic insight into the way
power politics, military morality, and the everyday world operated in
the medieval age. If you’re planning on writing something set in an
approximately medieval setting, or simply find the history
interesting, I can highly recommend all three.
Thaddeus
All three are decent reads - I do love the social history aspect of the 3rd most, though, as it helps the world feel more alive to me. :)
ReplyDeleteIt's a very engaging book, and helps answer lots of little questions (how is time measured, how many meals are eaten etc) that don't seem to crop up elsewhere. The Elizabethan and Restoration editions are both well worth a look too.
Delete